I often struggle with this (not having a further education in English language). I can't put my finger on why one works better than another. It just 'sounds' better in a specific context. The definite article often sounds more specific, presumptive, or even accusatory.
Where the cleverly wrought comparison breaks down for me in these examples is when the policeman asks his question only in reply to a statement, instead of boldly stating it from the off. Otherwise 'the' holds the forewarned presumption I was referring to.
I often struggle with this (not having a further education in English language). I can't put my finger on why one works better than another. It just 'sounds' better in a specific context. The definite article often sounds more specific, presumptive, or even accusatory.
Where the cleverly wrought comparison breaks down for me in these examples is when the policeman asks his question only in reply to a statement, instead of boldly stating it from the off. Otherwise 'the' holds the forewarned presumption I was referring to.
Is this how they are supposed to differ?
Excellent, except for the very last word. Scotch is “whisky”, not “whiskey”.
I think that was a deliberate mistake. But I meant to leave out the 'e' in the second occurrence. As a very small detail. I'll change it now.